2006 Mayor & City Council Election (all related posts)

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:57 pm

Voters election of an elected position v an appointed one for mayor raises many questions in my mind. Most important, what power will this position have ?

Will the mayor have an equal vote on the council, or, as some have suggested, have an executive option to override the majority of the council?

Will the mayor be the only one who can set the agenda, thereby determining what does and does not get voted on, or will the council members be able to get items on the agenda as they do now?

What will the mayors duties be within the city?

As best I recall, there is nothing within the city charter that even addresses teh powers given to an elected mayor.

The powers of the mayor or lack there of should be determined prior to the November Election.

What we dont need is a mayor to get in and then have that person have a right to vote on what their powers will or will not be.

Rather, the council should decide long before the election, even if one or two of them are running for the position.

What I think would be best is to have it very much like it is now, with no special powers given to the elected mayor, but a title only position, as it is now.

VicRiv · Post by **VicRiv** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:16 am

AmCan council candidate late on finance report deadline
By KERANA TODOROV, Register Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 2, 2006 11:58 PM PDT
All but one of the American Canyon City Council candidates in the June special election has filed required campaign finance papers, according to the American Canyon city clerk.

Paul Maguire, the former Napa Valley Casino owner, was among four City Council candidates who either raised or spent more than $1,000 in the June 6 special election and had until Monday to file the forms, according to information provided by the city. The filings are required under state campaign laws.

"I'll give him 10 days and then send him a letter," said Kay Woodson, American Canyon city clerk, adding candidates usually file their forms within that time period. She could then contact the Fair Political Practices Commission, she also said.

Maguire could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

The FPPC, the state commission regulating campaign financing and spending, can levy fines of varying amounts against candidates who violate campaign rules, according to its Web site.

The other candidates in the special election who raised more than $1,000 were John T. Miller, Ed West and Joan Bennett, according to previous campaign filings.

Bennett, a member of the city's first City Council, won the council seat former Vice Mayor Lori Luporini vacated in February after questions were raised about the legal status of Luporini's city residency.

Bennett, Miller and West filed their papers on time, according to city records.

Miller, a deputy labor commissioner for the state Department of Industrial Relations, raised a total of $12,850 and spent, $16,672 this year, according to the filings the city received July 27.

West, an officer with the Napa County Department of Corrections, spent and raised $9,797, according to his filings.

Bennett said she raised $4,754 and spent $3,937.

Both Miller and West are among the city residents who have taken out papers to run for City Council this fall, according to the city clerk.

Three American Canyon City Council members are up for re-election in November, including Vice Mayor Leon Garcia and Mayor Cecil Shaver.

Garcia reported he has received $579 in campaign contributions this year and Shaver, none, according to their campaign filings. Garcia said he has spent $256 so far, and Shaver, $4.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:37 am

Hmmm, must be a busy busy guy. I wish HE was running for City Council again.. He'd totally be in.

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:20 am

Just curious...Can a candidate run for Mayor and at the same time run for a Council seat? Or are they only allowed to run for one position at a time?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:55 pm

According to what I saw watching the meeting you can only run for Mayor or for city council not both. As I understand it there would be a conflict in winning both (if it happened) and create a need for a possible special election.

So with a vote of all council they decided to just allow a person to run for one or the other.

So besides Leon

Garcia is anybody else running for Mayor? I would hope other council people run as well. I don't feel anyone else is qualified and current to run.

Any thoughts on who should run and why? I am curious to see if who I am interested in is going to run.

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:22 pm

I would hope other council people run as well. I don't feel anyone else is qualified and current to run.

Well if thats the case, then why have an elected Mayor at all? Based on your post, the ONLY candidates that would be qualified to run are "council people" because they are "current".

However, in the last election, the voters overwhelmingly approved to have a choice for an elected mayor. If the voters were satisfied with the status quo, ( council members appointing each other mayor), then there would be no desire or need to have an Elected Mayor.

But the voters clearly are NOT satisfied with the status quo, and would like a choice in electing a mayor. This friday by 5pm I am very certain that Leon Garcia is not going to run unopposed and the voters are going to have a choice (s). I would bet on it.

VicRiv · Post by **VicRiv** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:03 pm

It would be nice to have opposition for any/all elected positions.

I just hope it isn't someone who has run before and repeatedly lost. Why waste their time and money? The citizens would have already spoken.

We need new blood, new ideas and solutions.

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:29 pm

Don Callison is going to run anyway. Cecil is running and lost 3 times prior before being elected, I admire their persistance.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:41 pm

It would be nice to have opposition for any/all elected positions.

I just hope it isn't someone who has run before and repeatedly lost. Why waste their time and money? The citizens would have already spoken.

We need new blood, new ideas and solutions.

Well, clearly the ones running have run before and lost - so, so much for that thought. I feel the candidates that have shown interest in running are totally dedicated to changing what is going on here in American Canyon. Clearly Victor, they don't feel it is a waste of money or time. Wow, you are so negitive these days!

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:47 am

Dear Fellow aconliner's

Thank you for the number of you that have suggested I run again for city council and for those who supported me in June. Your comments and support are appreciated. Thanks for the private messages and all the encouragement too.

But I will not be running for city council this time.

There are other qualified candidates running that I believe will make excellent councilpersons, who I expect to file soon. Rather than run against them, I prefer to support them.

My campaign this time for city council will be supporting those who I believe will do well on the council.

That leaves running for Mayor against Leon Garcia, which I am going to do. I will be filing this week this week.

All my campaign information will be posted next week, including all contact information.

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:10 pm

Well, I must admit I am very surprised no one has anything to say about your decision.

So I will ask...

You feel there are enough qualified candidates for a City Council seat. But are you not limiting your possibility to serve as a member of the Council by not running for City Council. (seeing that there are 3 seats available?)

I'm sure this took alot of thought...and the best of luck in your run to serve as the first "elected Mayor" of Am Can.

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:54 pm

Thank you for your good wishes.

In my view, everything happens for a reason. An elected Mayor ( vs an appointed one) has the blessing of the voters directly.

This past election the voters said they wanted an elected Mayor, and this November, they are going to get one.

Nothing could be worse for the voters than to have as their only choice current or past council members, who have appointed each other on a routine basis to run for Mayor. Essentially, nothing would have changed.

I like challenges, and yes, it would have been the easy thing to do to run again for council, and the likelyhood is I would have been elected to a seat, or at least had a better shot at winning a seat.

But what is the point of debating with a group of individuals who for the most part, have the same views about most of the issues? As an example I agree with Ed West on a good number of issues and I like him personally. We could work together. But why should he and I spend a bunch of money to win a seat when we mostly agree? It doesnt make any sense.

With the Mayor, you are part of the council but as well are in much more of a leadership position, which is where I have always been. My diversity of views with the members of the council who will run are stronger, the track record they will run on is a more lively debate, and the likelyhood of victory on election day more in question for all of us.

Win, lose or draw, at the end of the day, running for Mayor will expose more issues, bring more challenges to the status quo, and give the voters a non council choice for the seat. They deserve that.

Thanks for the question and your interest.

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:22 am

Well, it looks like it is going to be a very interesting race for Mayor.
Also, am I right that individuals wanting to run for a council seat still have one more week to file paperwork? I thought I read that in one of the local papers but maybe I misunderstood.

Mel · Post by **Mel** » Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:41 am

"the deadline to file has been shifted to Wednesday." From this mornings Times Herald.

I am excited to see how this Mayoral election plays out. Hopefully everyone is respectful and human towards others - and that includes those who post on this forum. Can we ALL play nice?

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:38 am

I am excited to see how this Mayoral election plays out. Hopefully everyone is respectful and human towards others - and that includes those who post on this forum. Can we ALL play nice?

Well Mel, only someone super cool like you would ask such a question, and all I can say is, I hope so.

Although the email campaign wasnt a good start, nor was the other call to the city.

Good will to you Mel.

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:34 am

I must really be out of the loop...

What email campaign and what call to the city???

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:07 pm

If your out of the loop, your out of the loop.

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:14 pm

Mr. Maguire I am disappointed by your response. Being out of the loop leaves things to be interpreted by the reader. You posted it! I would like to make an intelligent selection when I vote in November. Smart ass answers don't impress me.

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:10 am

Since the three of us are breaking new ground here, I wanted to wish you the best publicly before the campaigning begins. You know, it is so easy to be nice in the beginning, and sometimes not so easy in the middle or towards the end.

Hopefully this campaign won't get personal or mean spirited like alot of them do.

But I will tell you up front, if the mudslinging does gets personal, I bought a really BIG slingshot, and I might remind you both, that I live on a hill! (although Cindy does too, but I dont think she shoots well at night.)

So Leon, Cindy and I have both have the hills on either side fo town, and Im not exactly sure where you live, but doesn't that leave you in the middle somewhere in the flat lands?

Good luck with that.

Joking aside though, I look forward to the debates and the campaign with you both. Should you need to call my campaign to resolve a problem that may arise, my phone is open.( scheduling on debate, some other concern, etc)

See you on the campaign....

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:25 am

Oh nothing SA meant about it ac94503, those involved know about it. Basically, its a small clique using email and calling the city to stir up corral dust. Nothing new. Just flys in the face of "playing nice", thats the only reason I brought it up.

Like I said, not interested in promoting it.

Can you meet tomorrow or later this week? Email me on the private side if you can get together.

1momfor2 · Post by **1momfor2** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:11 am

I wish you well Mr. Maguire, I think it is going to be a tough race to call for some. Others not so tough.
Hopefully, it will be a clean run without the need for slingshots. But it is good to know you and Ms. Coffey both have the high ground....

Good Luck

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:53 pm

I think for myself it is going to be very difficult to decide between Mr. Maguire and Cindy. I voted for Mr. Maguire the last election and had already decided that if he ran again I would vote for him. Now with Cindy entering the Mayor race (who by the way has really impressed me during her tenure as a Councilmember) I do feel it will be a very hard decision for many of Mr. Maguire's and Cindy's supporters. Anyone else feel the same?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:09 am

Mr. Maguire would have been my first choice as I stated before when he ran for council. I am concerned over his motives for wanting the top job without any experience behind his belt.

I like to see people prove themselves worthy of my vote, show me what they are capable of. With Garcia and Coffee I have seen it. Garcia for 4 years and Coffee for 2. For me the choice is easy. If Maguire would have ran for council (and he still can) I would literally contribute to see him win and I am considered cheap by my wife.

I like him when he came to my house. I liked Coffee when she came to my house too. Never saw Garcia. Maybe my neighborhood is too rough.

Anyway two personable kids running for office, but one has the experience and has proven it in my book. But don't believe me, ask anybody who watches the meetings. We are changing as a city and we need new blood on council and with our Mayor. New experienced blood is my choice. I will support Coffee for Mayor and Maguire for council. (Remember you can write him in!) Wouldn't that be an upset. Hey when he wins remember I thought of it first.

[/b]

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:11 pm

Correct, we need new blood, and that has been stated by you and others, by the newspaper, and most importantly, by the voters in wanting an elected Mayor.

The only NEW BLOOD running for Mayor is Paul Maguire.

As for experience , my track record of successes in business and in life speaks for itself.

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:43 pm

Any bets that there will be any other prospective candidates file by tomorrow night?

mindingcitybiz · Post by **mindingcitybiz** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:42 pm

I just heard we have someone added to the list of voters today. From the sounds of things its going to be a great line up.

amcannative · Post by **amcannative** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:59 pm

I am responding on this page, because the page congratulating my daughter for her community contribution, should have been kept for that. She did that out of her desire to help the memorial fund and thus the youth and the Aquatic program.

The sign issue is one of the biggest election issues being discussed. I don't expect many of you to understand it, because it deals with ethics and character.

Everyone agrees that we need to get a High School, improve intfra-structure, re-visit the General Plan and establish a URL. These are no-brainers.

The issues that have haunted this town are ethical issues- residency of past and present candidates, bridges to places that should not have been built at city expense, bad checks being passed by officials, etc. Is it any wonder that at least one member of the council is more worried about phantom bad people moving signs, than the idea that I saw candidate representatives placing signs in illegal spots. The answer I got was my lawyer says I have the first amendment right to break that law? Public Property is our porerty and no one should be allowed to litter it with signs. Permission is required for the placement of signs. I had and have permission for every one of my signs that was up and will be up. Not a single Ed West sign was turned in to the Public Works people, you're a liar if say one was. Character and integrity says I will not break a law or rule, just because I can.

If a candidiate can ot follow the law and has no respect for the law before they are elected, how will they behave after? We have seen that answer in the current council and in past.

Before you whine that I am rude and name calling, I am not- I am not Politically Correct, but then I am not a politician, I am a representative- big difference

Ed West

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:43 pm

The horses haven't left the gate and the name calling begins. I too commend your daughter on a job well done and very admirable.

I don't condone your name calling. I wouldn't want my "representative" to be rude to other residents simply because you disagree. You displayed anger during the forum towards J.T. Miller interrupting him during his time to talk. Doesn't that show that you have an issue with rules?

I am not happy with the sign madness either. The candidates who show a complete disregard for the "rules" should have consequences. Look at the current signs up 8 days before they are technically allowed and in public easments and on private property.

Maybe a letter should be turned in by candidates for placing signs on various public properties prior to posting. Wouldn't that resolve it?

All I can say is turn down the anger it isn't at all appealing and certainly isn't productive. As for the "phantom sign moving" it happens, just like supporters putting out signs everywhere unbeknownst to the candidates.

As for the candidate who "calls a lawyer" on how to follow city ordinances well then maybe you should share his name so he will follow the rules this time without the old freedom of speech cliche.

Councilmember Coffey · Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:40 am

It is a shame that a candidate can't run on merit, experience, or passion for the job. Somebody who has taken the time to do the job correctly by working with staff prior to voting on Thursday evening agendas and clearly understanding the issues.

I am proud of my record since elected. I am running on that record. Making innuendos about issues without facts is clearly irresponsible especially if the information is coming from former disgruntled employees.

If a candidate wants to succeed in this election it will be about character, qualifications and the time/desire to serve the people, not serve themselves. Statements filled with "me, I or myself" have no real place in an election because those are self-serving.

This city is evolving into a saavy group. A city that wants results, quality, and passion. A candidate who cares about all of the residents and the city. So whether you run for city council or for Mayor this time it isn't going to be who's popular but who is better suited for the job.

amcannative · Post by **amcannative** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:39 am

Rio Rancho Rey- I never called anyone a name, find it, show me where I called anyone a name? Secondly, those forums had no rules. The campaign has an ordinance about signs, the forum had no rules. Many candidiates are talking about holding our own forums. Forums where if JT Miller makes a blatently false statement about a topic like he did, then they can be called on it and challenged to sustantiate their position.

Cindy, you have made many dollars on inuendo and falsehoods. Your paper is disgusting and that was demonstrated when you allowed that hit piece to be printed last elelction. You live on negativity. Most comments you made Thursday night were complaints. You demonstrated why you should not be Mayor. You should have fixed those complaints and reported that, rather than just whine about the issue.

Before you and other ask, why call you on this, when we are not running against each other- it is because I call thihngs the way they are! Not for my own benefit, but rather because they need to be called. It is probably better for my campaign to ignore you, but I live here and will not see it continue to be denegraded and turned into a bastion of hate and negativity- you want negative, look in the mirror

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:58 am

Why are there still signs out from the last election? Don't candidates have to make sure they are all picked up?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:30 am

I wish you the best Mr. West, but you are very wrong about Councilmember Coffey. I watch every council meeting. Are you there? She is the only person telling the staff what the residents (old and new) need. She holds people accountable and I like that.

We have spent way too much money on crap in my opinion. She calls them on it. I didn't support her in 04 but I sure as hell support her now. She follows up with issues. It's about time we had somebody like that who isn't so busy blowing sunshine up people's backsides to look good.

Where the hell is the high school that was promised to us in the 2002 election by Mr. Garcia? You know the one he promised to have built before his term was up if we all supported him and what about the gang problems that he promised would go away, hell I have to scrub off grafitti every Monday from the gangs off of my back fence.

She is the only one who asks the important questions and she is prepared. I can understand her when she is talking and she doesn't repeat what other people say in their own words like other councilmembers.

As for the newspaper, it is pretty much dead on each time and not any worse than any of the other mainstream papers in town including the Echo.

Your too reactionary and thin skinned to be on council. Your posts show this. You will not be my representative nor a politician with my vote.

mindingcitybiz · Post by **mindingcitybiz** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:16 pm

I have personnally contacted Cindy Coffey with a problem in my neighborhood and she address it immediately. Councilwoman Coffey brought the complaint to the attention of her fellow council members during the city council meeting. The issue was taken care of by the following week. This shows me that Councilwoman Coffey is listening to we the people. Bringing this issue to her co-councilmembers shows Coffey is a team player and not only is concerned with only her constition problems, but also wants to know if other citizens in the community are experiencing the similar problems. This concern shows she is not only looking at my problem, but also seeing if something needs to be changed within the way the city deals with issues or in some cases may need to implement new laws, such as the election sign law.

We need Coffey multiplied four times over!

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:00 am

Signs:

a: How about someone post this ordinance that is active on this web site, so we can all read it , then we can discuss it.

b. Signs can be put up 90 days before an election per the ordinance

c. If hte new ordinance passed, it does not take effect for 30 days, unless, it is an emergency ordinance, which clearly it was not. Once an election starts, the ordinance in effect applys.

d. It STINKS to high heaven that 3 candidates wish to change the sign ordinance in the middle of an election for which all three of them are running. That has the appearance of being unethical and an abuse of power. That IS a real issue.

e. Clearly some of you are doing the dirty work for your candidate, which apparently your candidate cannot do for themselves. I got it.

f. If you think that I have signs in my campaign, that staff placed improperly that violate the sign ordinance, tell me what sign and where, how it violates the ordinance, and I will look into it. If it is, I will kindly take it down. Mistakes can be made, mistakes can be corrected.

g. If you think signs are going to win this election for any of you, your sadly mistaken.

h. There is fine line between candidates bitching about signs,the sign ordinance, and the restriction of free political speech. Keep that in mind when you read all this rhetoric about character on a sign ordinance...the fact is that in 30 days or less, there will be signs all over this town from candidates who are running for Congress on down to our city. I am sure you will not be complaining about those signs at all- no, only those signs of those that compete against your candidate.

i. I agree with Mr West that writing bad checks, paying for non city improvements, or otherwise lying to the public is not the character of a good candidate or councilmember,: I would like to know who specifically he is referring to that is running in this campaign that has any issue at all with residency in American Canyon? Well, Mr West, who specifically are you referring too who is a current candidate? I presume the former is Lori Luporini.

j. I agree with others that hte negativity coming from a few people who seem to be part of a small group is unproductive for your city, and unnecessary.

It appears early on this may be a very nasty negative campaign although it does not need to be. Here we see all this attack on peoples character, and very very little talk about the issues of our city.

I intend to change that as Mayor of this city. All this infighting, backstabbing, settling old scores , and the we vs them mentallity that some of these candidates and residents have demonstrated is unproductive, stressful, and just a waste of good talent.

It needs to end, and this city needs to start finding common ground amongst all of us, to move forward in a positive direction, and work towards common goals.

Don Callison · Post by **Don Callison** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:05 pm

My name is Don Callison and I am a candidate for City Council. Some of you may know me, and others may not.

Some of my history. I have lived here since 1995. I have been active in city politics from about day one. My first venture was to attend city council meetings and community meetings when redevelopment was the hot topic. From there I served on an Adhoc committee that reviewed the Waste Water Treatment Plant. Lastly, I have been on the Planning Commission for nearly eight years. I am an active Kiwanian, a little league coach, a father of two, and a husband.

I am a small business owner, a professional, and I am dedicated to public service. I served four years in the Navy during the cold war era, I graduated from San Jose State with a degree in Business Administration.

I am running for City Council because I feel I have more to give to this city.

Some of the key issues in my eyes and as I have heard from others are the following:

1) High School for American Canyon
2) Get the General Plan updated as soon as possible
3) Establish an Urban Line Limit to define the true boundaries of the City
4) Enhance and expand programs for youth and seniors
5) Represent the city in a professional, and ethical manner

These are only some of the issues. I would appreciate any input from you the readers of this post. You may concact me directly at dwcallison@comcast.net.

I appreciate your time and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely

Don Callison

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:19 pm

Don,

Best wishes in your campaign. The city is fortunate to have you as a candidate for city council.

Paul Maguire

Don Callison · Post by **Don Callison** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:43 pm

Paul,

Thank you for your kind words. I do appreciate it. I also wish you luck in your campaingn. It takes courage and dedication to put yourself out there, and I admire you, and all of the candidates for stepping forward in this endeavor.

Sincerely,

Don

amcannative · Post by **amcannative** » Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:41 pm

Paul
Please quit naming me as sources of postings here- I am not doing that to you. DO not use my name unless you know it is correct- That is only courteous.

You and I met at my house and talked for a good couple of hours. I thought we were polite to each other and that I had some commonality with you. I went to the City Council Meeting and NEVER mentioned your name, I have never mentioned your name on here. I simply believe that candidates need to behave with character and integrity. I do not buy the concept that just because Senate or Congress Candidates break the law that means it is OK for us? I don't smoke dope just because many others do. I never named your signs as offenders, I just want to educate the public on what is correct and what is not and I will let them decide after that. By the way the rules were in place when we ran in June, no one is changing them, just enforcing them. Below are 5 copies of e-mails that I have recieved- You can deny their authenticity if you want, but I hope we can trust each other more than that. I am not putting their names, due to privacy issues.

Mr West thank you for speaking up for us- I understand it, but some do not. It is our property, no one should abuse it with signs

Ed check in the mail. It is not the signs it is the principle

If they disagree with another law or regulation will they also break that- Thank You

I saw you Thursday- you and Joan seem to understand the issue. I will look for violators.

I turned you in for your sign last year at the boys and Girls club- then I was told that Lorrain gave you permission- sorry.

Paul we are not running against each other- I am going to call Cindy and talk with her, I have spoken to Leon and attended a function with him. I have not been invited to any by you or Cindy so I have not been there.

Please just treat me with the same respect that you would ask for. Do not use my name unless you are accurate-

Ed West

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:12 pm

My message to the Candidates...

I think this whole sign thing is out of hand. Why not put up your signs and stop this nonsense. I don't vote because I see a sign...I want to hear what the candidate is going to do for me and my area of American Canyon. In fact, we live in the same area and I'm sure you have noticed the garbage that is collecting in the fields that we still have not built on!Why don't you and your running mates start addressing some of the issues that concern myself and several neighbors and stop this
upholding the law attitude, it is a waste of time!

I suggest all of the candidates start using some common sense and stop the sign patrol. Issa provides free space to tell us about your position on some very important decisions that will take place over the next 4 years. Why not address why I should vote for you or anyone else running?

amcannative · Post by **amcannative** » Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:09 pm

American Canyon is not a single issue community and signs are not a minor issue to some.

The issues? That is a great concept, but which one? As I campaigned last time I found the issue was the noise in the AM from the garbage trucks, some felt that they were being ripped off in lighting and landscape fees. Some wanted a High School, some wanted lower water rates, some wanted better lighting, some wanted more lighting. Then there are the Law and Order crowds and the I hate cops crowds, I even was faced with how do you feel about abortion and how do I feel about gun control.

I think your statement is very good, but as a candidiate there is no minor issue. I need to respond to the issues at hand at the moment. All of the above are legitimate and real issues to the persons complaining. To be honest I was never asked about issues that I consider real important, General Plan update, URL, never asked a question about either of those, not even at the forums. To be a Representative I have to be up to date on all the issues at hand and when I don't know the answer, I have to say I don't know about that but will get back to you.

I will weigh in right now on one issue-

American Canyon High School is vital to our future and if the City is not pro-active in hiring a professional firm and promoting this bond issue up in Napa on our own, we have fallen backwards. We can not count on the School District to protect our interests. We became a city to control our destiny and remove the control from the County. Now we have placed the most important issue to face us since incorporation in the hands of the School District. We also need a plan "B".

Ed West

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:52 pm

Mr. West,

Thank you for bringing up "What's Important" to a resident in American Canyon. I would like to start a thread here as to what is important to me as a resident of Rancho for the last 21 years.

1. Garbage I have to pick up due to the wind because a neighbor is not required to use the pick up service but insists on filling up the bed of his truck with his household garbage until someone complains and it is hauled off.

2. The garbage that is thrown from cars because being a "Litter Bug" apparently wasn't important enough that parents forgot to teach their children what the effects of garbage has on a community.

3. I watched the sign spinners pointing the direction to the new homes along Wetlands Edge, pointing to prospective buyers to not use Rio del Mar as a travel route. Why do you think that is? Could it be that the area looks totally run down? What are we going to do about that?

I realize this sounds a very "minor" problem that this city faces but it has gone unaddressed for way to long. The appearance of this city is not attractive when the streets are strewn with garbage and graffiti.

I would suggest that any candidate address the small problems first (which seriously have pretty easy solutions if some people put their heads together) and then once these issues are addressed...the much more important agenda items as you mentioned can be addressed by the new council.

I remember something that Vic Riv posted about the time it takes to get anything approved while serving on the Park Commission. I truely believe many of us are tired of the delays and would like to see a decision made on several issues instead of the constant rescheduling for another meeting.

amcannative · Post by **amcannative** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:06 am

I really appreciate the pro-active tone and you sharing your concerns. I think a thread of issues would be great. We all know the major issues, traffic, a High School, infra-structure, but these issues seem small, but they are directly related to the quality of life and our appearance directly relates to the sense of community and pride. I have a very good idea for the litter issue. I am frustrated on garbage day because we put our cans out and even they get tossed around over-night. I do believe we should have mandatory service requirments, I thought we did. I will have to research that.

I hope more people post truely pro-active issues based comments.

Thank you

Don Callison · Post by **Don Callison** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:04 am

I appreciate this string and the expression of issues that are important to people.

I believe we have different levels of isssues. Those that are complex and far reaching such as the High School, General Plan Update, URL, Town Center, etc. and those that are just as important and more localized such as neighborhood preservation issues. I too believe we have mandatory garbage p/u, and if we don't, we need to. If someone can't afford the $18 per month I believe there is public assistance to help them with that bill. However, what we can't do is force someone to actually use the container and put it on their curb on a given day. That takes more in depth intervention and unfortunately, complaints from neighbors. Our current code enforcement is complaint driven. Perhaps we need to look at this further. As for helping revive some of the more mature neighborhoods, I believe the city could develop some type of loan guarntee program for those folks that would like to make home repairs or cosmetic upgrades, but may not be able to do it on their own. This would require some research, but I know other cities have done it successfully and adopting a model that works for American Canyon should be relatively easy.

I agree that some issues seem to be perpetually continued from one agenda to the next. One way to work with staff is to have a section of the agenda for issues that may be resolved in one meeting and at least implement some action on those items. Put those first in the agenda, and then have the more complex issues that take much discussion put toward the back until they are at a point where the public takes more interest. Just a thought.

As for the signs, each candidate received the rules and regulations. It is up to the candidate to make sure his or her signs are displayed legally. I believe the way they display their signs indicates their level of understanding and respect for the rules as written. Unless the candidate implements a change to the rules, they should be followed as written. Just my opinion.

Thanks for your time

Don Callison

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:04 pm

As I mentioned in another thread, I would like to start a new thread that residents could post their complaints or solutions so the prospective mayor and councilmembers will be aware of what we as residents would like to see improved.

I know from previous elections that code enforcement to clean up the eyesores in town was a very popular discussion on this site. I would like to bring that complaint back for discussion. I remember when the City Council decided that there would be a rotation throughout the City to clean up properties. In fact, there was a slide show and I believe a special council meeting just to address this issue. (Please correct me if I am wrong.) So, what has happened to that plan.

Please drive thru Rancho and tell me if it is our turn again. Fields and streets are littered with garbage. Graffiti was addressed when it was posted on this site. What happened...one quick fix and then we don't need to address this issue anymore? I believe a policy was voted on by the City Council...so why do certain areas still look so run down.

I would like to thank Mr. West and Mr. Callison for responding to my questions on another thread. Also, Mr. Maguire posted several suggestions when he previously ran for Council.

So...

What can you do to earn my vote ...

Problem: Clean up the many eyesores that exist and continue to exist in American Canyon.

Solution: Change the code enforcement from having to identify yourself as the complainant.

I hope others will take the opportunity to post their concerns...

amcannative · Post by **amcannative** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:35 pm

JOIN DON CALLISON AND ED WEST FOR A CAMPAIGN KICK OFF PARTY

WHEN: Sept. 16th

6:30-8:30

Where: American Canyon Marriot Fairfield Suite

Highway 29 next to the visitor’s center

Why attend: Show your support for Ed and Don-

Plus it will be catered, free food, free sodas, waters and coffee and tea.

(what better reason)

Let’s talk and discuss issues- even if you don’t support one or both of us, come and talk

We are not too proud to take donations!

Please forward this to anyone you know that lives here in American Canyon. Even if they don’t vote we will have voter registration forms available for them.[/b]

Thanks – Ed and Don

Paul Maguire · Post by **Paul Maguire** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:18 am

I disagreed with the council on publicly identifying those who file code enforcement complaints, and did so on this forum some time ago.

You're absolutely right ac94503, it is not only bad policy ( which some would argue this council is known for), but may even be dangerous. Having been a property ownership business, I have seen first hand retaliation on residents who complain about others.

I think the policy is a bad one, and was made for the wrong reasons. Code enforcement is a police matter in some cases ( towing cars for example) and all residents should be able to discreetly file complaints, and keep their privacy.

This is why we need new blood on the council, and people with experience in real life matters, such as how people respond when they are complained about by a neighbor. (Some fail to realize not all will act the way you would).

And I echo your concerns about the poor condition of some properties, especially city properties that go unwatered at time allowing landscaping to die off, or are left full of weeds for months, or are unkept.

An example me is the intersection at Eucalyptus on the way to my home, at the stop sign just past 7-11. Here you have the same city barriers, and sand bags, sitting there ALL SUMMER LONG! Yes, it looks poor, and as you know, there are lots of other conditions as well.

I have made suggestions in the past, such as providing paint for owners who cannot afford to fix up their homes, and other ideas on this forum, such as neighborhood clean ups and working with neighborhoods to set up some standards that the residents agree with.

Your second concern in my view is a result of two factors that need to change:

1. The lack of pride this council has shown in taking care of its community, providing leadership to city staff, and having a vision that is consistant with the residents.

2. This follows the first, which is the lack of management in the city, as the city council pressures the former manager Mr Joseph to resign, with no real plan to move forward. Thus, we end up with chaos in the city, empty desks with work not even being looked at. and of course, were never ever given a reason for all of it. We have lost good. long term employees, and anyone in business, which most of these council members HAVE NEVER BEEN, knows that when you lose key people, you better pick up the slack immediately with hiring and helping to keep things going. ( And again, I think there is a general agreement that the council is entitled to make changes, but my point is the poor way it was handled, the lack of planning and disorganization afterwards, and let me add, the lack of respect shown which was unfortunate)

In sum, your complaints are a symptom of the greater problem of the lack of experience, direction, and poor policies this city has seen from this council.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:31 am

Wait a minute... You two are running together? I didn't know that when I decided to vote for one of you... Now, my vote is up in the air. No need to beat me up for this. I like one and not the other - I am totally entitled to that.

amcannative · Post by **amcannative** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:12 am

It is very common to have kick off parties and election night parties jointly. There are two seats available and although Don and I do not see eye to eye on everything, we are similar in our approaches and communicate and interact in the same fashion. There is no better choice than Don and I!

Rather than make judgment on one of us, come to the party and interact. Ask your questions and make challenges, we love that environment and welcome it.

You might just change your mind

Your opinion acknowledged!

Ed West

Don Callison · Post by **Don Callison** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:39 pm

Dear Curious,

There are many reasons for Ed and I campaigning together. One is to take advantage of Economies of Scale. Bottom line is it saves us money, and it saves you time by only having to attend one event to hear from more than one candidate.

We have also discussed sponsoring our own candidate forums and invite all of the candidates for city council. This allows you the voter to hear from and get to know all the candidates so that your decision at the poll in November is as informed as possible.

Whether you like one of us, both of us, or neither of us is not as important as making an informed decision at the polls in November.

I would extend an invitation to you to attend our event. Take the time to get to know us better and let us know what issues are most important to you.

Thanks for taking the time to post on this thread.

Sincerely,

Don Callison

ac94503 · Post by **ac94503** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:31 pm

I know that this site can create change. However, many of the registered users no longer use this site as an avenue to direct their complaints or solutions to what you feel is important to you as a citizen of American Canyon.

What an opportunity to speak directly to the candidates about the problems( future and past) that we now face.

In the last week, Mr. West, Mr. Callison and Mr. Maguire have adddressed issues posted. I appreciate them responding.

What is wrong with the other 100 registered users on this site? You know as well as I do that everyone who is anyone in the political arena is reading AmCan Online! What causes a community to shut-up and not speak to each other? Criticism? Believe me, if that were the case none of these or any other candidates would run for office in this town. I wouldn't do it!

So why don't we use this forum to communicate with each other and find out "What it is going to take" to make American Canyon join together and make good decisions for our future.