Sign of the Times

Share your thoughts, questions, comments, or anything else regarding our city in the general forum. What do you like about our city? What needs improvement? Whats happening in your area? If theres an issue that needs to be brought to attention discuss it here. ONLY REGISTERED USERS MAY POST IN THIS AREA. (Note: This has been temporarily disabled. If the forum is not abused we will remove registration requirements to post. Thank you.)

Moderator: Issa

Forum rules
Please follow the terms of use as illustrated on the main page of the forum. Only registered users may post in this forum. Classified posts and events must be posted in the Classifieds and Events forum. Thank you.
Post Reply
Councilmember Coffey
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:10 pm

Sign of the Times

Post by Councilmember Coffey »

Here is an overview of why there were 3 meetings to create the new sign ordinance.


Meeting 1) You discuss to create direction to the city attorney for a draft of how you want the ordinance to read.

Meeting 2) You review it and possibly vote on it by the "first reading" only. However if there are significant changes then you have to send it back for a redrafting for another first reading. Otherwise you bring it back for the final and second reading.

Meeting 3) During meeting #2 there were not significant changes to create a redraft, but simply minor corrections and a few deletions. This is the result of having the public comments as well as council comments. I would agree that there was an overabundance of discussion on what some people would consider to be very insignificant. However, to the people who commented as well as my fellow councilmembers this was an important issue and rightly so.

There were blatent violations last election, some now including prematurely placed signs, yard signs from June. But since the ordinance just passed these slipped under the wire.

I did support fines for city picked up signs after the election. I cannot support fines for during the election as some people may move signs. If people don't believe this it does happen. It happened in surrounding citys. Anything to give another candidate bad press.

I personally haven't even ordered my signs. It isn't a priority for me, when and if it happens I will follow the ordinance.

Debating an issue is important, you have 5 people with 5 opinions. By debating and discussing it the constituent usually receives the most thought out response which would build a consensus. Sometimes it is a quick process and sometimes it isn't. It all depends on who does their homework and who doesn't that can hold a meeting up.

The process is very complete and worth the trouble. I must say that you may not always agree with Victor but he is right when he says it is about discussing the issue that it is important.
ac94503
V.I.P.
V.I.P.
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:32 pm

Signs

Post by ac94503 »

I would like to suggest that you keep the ordinance very simple. If a sign is in the wrong place it will be removed and destroyed. End of story. When handing out the small yard signs ask your supporters to place them farther back on their property to deter kids from vandalizing them. City staff will not take calls regarding reports on signs but will initiate their own removal as offenses are discovered.
Post Reply